Investigating the possibilities of hadith text: jurisprudential study in importance, scope and working laws

Abstract

This research participates in studying the phenomenon of separating jurisprudential laws from the Hadith texts that may use the resemblance in some of them as a reason for invalidating them which can lead to the disruption of the Sharia, and departure from the covenant to the commands of God.

The research aims to show the importance of the jurisprudence of possibility as one of the methodological laws.

It presents a summary of its importance, scope, and the most prominent laws for its activation with a critical inductive descriptive methodology.

It comes to conclude that the studies investigating the prophetic texts away from the laws of systematic methodology will create troubles in the Islamic laws, because of the suspicions that deviate the text from its context, and can lead to demanding its invalidation at the end.

One reason for that is the ignorance of the jurisprudence of possibility, which belongs to the group of constitutional principles regulating the methods of reading and deduction.

In this context, this study investigates a part of the impact of possibility in deducing the Islamic legal law through its importance and its role in different fields.

It also studies the care of the Islamic jurisprudence about the effects of possibility, and the smart ways to balance between what is correct and what is not.

The research recommends directing studies to enrich this topic, and to facilitate the identification of the outputs of the science of problematic issues of Hadith and the science of principles jurisprudence, and their application in jurisprudence studies